Republicans look like fools.

I had a conversation over the weekend with a friend, a lifelong conservative republican, about the republican nomination process. I’m not really sure who he ideal candidate was, but he’s willing to get onboard with Team Romney. (Romney, of course, is not a lifelong conservative republican.) His problem with the process, however, was not that it was too long, or that the candidates were spending too much and needed to save for the general election against Obama, but rather, “That we look like fools.” This man has never voted for a democrat, moderate or otherwise, in his life.

Herman Cain. Seriously? Bachmann. She left the race today, but how did she make it so far? The average independent is not inspired by the republican field, much less the republican party right now.

What allows Gail Collins to have so much fun with her Quiz for all Seasons?

VI. Match the candidate with a high point from his book:

1) Mitt Romney

2) Herman Cain

3) Rick Perry

4) Ron Paul

5) Newt Gingrich

A) He’s “the kind of guy who goes jogging in the morning, packing a Ruger .380 with laser sights and loaded with hollow-point bullets and shoots a coyote that is threatening his daughter’s dog.”

B) Tells the reader how to become the C.E.O. of Self.

C) “Chicken-hawks are individuals who dodged the draft when their numbers came up but who later became champions of senseless and undeclared wars when they were influencing foreign policy. Former Vice President Cheney is the best example of this disgraceful behavior.”

D) His daughter and co-author tells about the time she averted a meltdown during a TV makeup session by begging her father to “Close your eyes and go to a happy place.”

E) “I love jokes and I love laughing.”

Granted, Gail Collins pokes fun at a lot of things, but now consider the assessment in this week’s Economist, arguably the most sober and thoughtful of all the English language weeklies:

Nowadays, a candidate must believe not just some but all of the following things: that abortion should be illegal in all cases; that gay marriage must be banned even in states that want it; that the 12m illegal immigrants, even those who have lived in America for decades, must all be sent home; that the 46m people who lack health insurance have only themselves to blame; that global warming is a conspiracy; that any form of gun control is unconstitutional; that any form of tax increase must be vetoed, even if the increase is only the cancelling of an expensive and market-distorting perk; that Israel can do no wrong and the “so-called Palestinians”, to use Mr Gingrich’s term, can do no right; that the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Education and others whose names you do not have to remember should be abolished.

These fatwas explain the rum list of candidates: you either have to be an unelectable extremist who genuinely believes all this, or a dissembler prepared to tie yourself in ever more elaborate knots (the flexible Mr Romney). Several promisingly pragmatic governors, including Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie and Jeb Bush, never even sought the nomination. Jon Huntsman, the closest thing to a moderate in the race (who supports gay marriage and action to combat climate change), is polling in low single figures.

As I wrote earlier today, I believe the nomination is Romney’s to lose. The question remains, however: how much was the average independent swing voter – who will decide this election, in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Virginia, et al. – dismayed by the circus that is this process? If this election is a referendum on Obama, republicans should have the upper hand… if they haven’t shown themselves to be “fools” in the run-up.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Election 2012

One response to “Republicans look like fools.

  1. As a Brit, I must say I have found the last few years of American politics fascinating, in some respects I envy the political system and climate you guys have immensely. The fact that not only are phrases are ideas such as “limited government” and “tax cuts” acceptable but indeed a vital part of the political rhetoric in one of the two major parties is such a welcome contrast to our political consensus here in the UK which is essentially left and further left. However on the other hand I am completely befuddled by the social side of the Republican party not to mention the foreign policy. The preoccupation with abortion and gay marriage which in the UK are non-issues is disappointing, especially the apparent need among the Santorum types to not only moralise on such things but also to forcibly shove them down everyone else’s throat, not to mention the fact that constitutionally the Federal government should have little authority in either case. The existence however of candidates such as Gary Johnson and Ron Paul both socially and economically liberal in the classical sense is hugely heartening. As I see it American politics is currently a massive contrast with many inconsistencies, on the fiscal side of things they are miles ahead of us but with regard to social and foreign policy they seem to revert back to the 16th century.

Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s